Migration Guides/Hub To Public Pypi
Migration guide: Hub install → public PyPI
As of Guardrails 0.11.0, Guardrails-AI-owned validators have moved from the private Guardrails registry
(pypi.guardrailsai.com, installed via guardrails hub install) to public
PyPI. Each validator is now published as a guardrails-ai-<name> distribution
and imported from the PEP 420 guardrails_ai namespace.
What changed
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| guardrails hub install hub://guardrails/detect_pii | pip install guardrails-ai-detect-pii |
| from guardrails.hub import DetectPII | from guardrails_ai.detect_pii import DetectPII |
| Private registry pypi.guardrailsai.com (token required) | Public PyPI (no token) |
| Dist name guardrails-grhub-detect-pii | guardrails-ai-detect-pii |
The registered validator name is unchanged — @register_validator(name="guardrails/detect_pii")
still resolves, so Guard().use(...) and existing guards keep working.
Deprecation timeline (back-compat is preserved for now)
Nothing breaks today. During the deprecation window:
- guardrails hub install hub://guardrails/<name> still works — it now
installs guardrails-ai-<name> from public PyPI and prints a
DeprecationWarning pointing at the equivalent pip install command. The
same warning is emitted by uninstall, list, submit, and
create-validator.
- from guardrails.hub import X still works — if an export isn't found in
the local hub registry, it falls back to scanning installed guardrails_ai.*
packages and emits a one-time DeprecationWarning recommending the direct
from guardrails_ai.<name> import X import.
Both the guardrails hub CLI and the guardrails.hub import shim are scheduled
for removal in the next major release. Update install commands and imports
to the public-PyPI form at your convenience before then.
How to migrate
1. Replace guardrails hub install hub://guardrails/<name> with
pip install guardrails-ai-<name> (underscores in <name> become dashes in
the dist name).
2. Replace from guardrails.hub import <Export> with
from guardrails_ai.<name> import <Export>.
3. For validators that ship local models, run the post-install step after
installing — see the package's README on PyPI.
Browse the full catalog of validators and their new package names in theguardrails-hub repo's VALIDATORS.md.
---
Related: RAIL (.rail) removal — next major
The .rail XML spec format and the Guard.for_rail / Guard.for_rail_string
APIs are being removed in the next major release (this also drops the lxml
dependency). Migrate RAIL-defined guards to Pydantic or JSON-schema guards:
- Guard.for_rail("spec.rail") / Guard.for_rail_string(...) →
Guard.for_pydantic(MyModel) or a JSON-schema-based guard plus plain
messages.
- The guardrails validate CLI command (which parsed .rail) is removed.
Validator quality criteria expressed in RAIL map directly ontoGuard().use(<Validator>, ...) calls.
---
How To Guides/Output
Output Element
The <output>...</output> element of a RAIL spec is used to give precise specification of the expected output of the LLM. It specifies
1. the structure of the expected output (e.g. JSON),
2. the type of each field,
3. the quality criteria for each field to be considered valid (e.g. generated text should be bias-free, generated code should be bug-free), and
4. the corrective action to take in case the quality criteria is not met (e.g. reask the question to the LLM, filter offending values, progrmatically fix, etc.)
Example:
=== "JSON RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="text" description="The generated text" format="two-words" on-fail-two-words="reask"/>
<float name="score" description="The score of the generated text" format="min-val: 0" on-fail-min-val="fix"/>
<object name="metadata" description="The metadata associated with the generated text">
<string name="key_1" description="description of key_1" />
...
</object>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"text": "string output",
"score": 0.0,
"metadata": {
"key_1": "string",
...
}
}=== "String RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output
type="string"
description="The generated text"
format="two-words"
on-fail-two-words="reask"
/>
</rail>=== "Output String"
string output⚡ Specifying output structure
You can combine RAIL elements to create an arbitrarily complex output structure.
Flat JSON output
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="some_key" ..../>
<integer name="some_other_key" ..../>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_key": "string",
"some_other_key": 0
}JSON output with objects
object elements can be used to specify a JSON object, which is a collection of key-value pairs.
- A child of an object element represents a key in the JSON object. The child element can be any RAIL element, including another list or object elements. The value of the key is generated by the LLM based on the info provided by the child element.
- An object element can have multiple children, each of which can be any RAIL element, including another list or object elements.
- Formatters can be applied to the child elements of an object element. For example, if the child element is a string element, the format attribute can be used to specify the quality criteria for the strings in the list.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<object name="some_object">
<string name="some_str_key" description="What should the value for this key represent?" validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words" />
<integer name="some_other_key" description="What should this integer represent?" validators="guardrails/valid_range:0" />
</object>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_object": {
"some_str_key": "SOME STRING",
"some_other_key": 0
}
}In the above example, "SOME STRING" is the value for the some_str_key key, and is generated based on the name, description and quality criteria provided by the <string name="some_str_key" ... /> element.
!!! note
The object element doesn't need to have children. If child elements are not provided, the LLM will automatically generate keys and values for the object based on the name, description and format attributes of the object element.
Providing child elements is useful when you want to specify the keys and values that the LLM should generate.
JSON output with lists
list elements can be used to specify a list of values.
- Currently, a list element can only contain a single child element. This means that a list can only contain a single type of data. For example, a list can only contain strings, or a list can only contain integers, but a list cannot contain both strings and integers.
- This child element can be any RAIL element, including another list or object elements.
- The child of a list element doesn't need to have a name attribute, since items in a list don't have names.
- Formatters can be applied to the child element of a list element. For example, if the child element is a string element, the format attribute can be used to specify the quality criteria for the strings in the list.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<list name="some_list" format="min-len: 2">
<string validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words" />
</list>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_list": [
"STRING 1", "STRING 2"
]
}
!!! note
The list element doesn't need to have a child element. If a child element is not provided, the LLM will automatically generate values for the list based on the name, description and format attributes of the list element.
Providing a child element is useful when you want to have more control over the values that the LLM should generate.
String output
Generate simple strings by specifying type="string" in the <output ... /> element.
All the formatters supported by the string element can be used to specify the quality criteria for the generated string.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output
type="string"
format="two-words"
on-fail-two-words="reask"
/>
</rail>=== "Output"
string output🏷️ RAIL Elements
At the heart of the RAIL specification is the use of elements. Each element's tag represents a type of data. For example, in the element <string ... />, the tag represents a string, the <integer ... /> elements represents an integer, the <object ...></object> element represents an object, etc.
!!! note
The tag of RAIL element is the same as the "type" of the data it represents.
E.g. <string .../> element will generate a string, <integer .../> element will generate an integer, etc.
Supported types
Guardrails supports many data types, including:, string, integer, float, bool, list, object, url, email and many more.
Check out the RAIL Data Types page for a list of supported data types.
#### Scalar vs Non-scalar types
Guardrails supports two types of data types: scalar and non-scalar.
| Scalar | Non Scalar |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Scalar types are void elements, and can't have any child elements. | Non-scalar types can be non-void, and can have closing tags and child elements. |
| Syntax: `` <string ... /> ` | Syntax: `<list ...> <string /> </list>`|string
| Examples: , integer, float, bool, url, email, etc. | Examples: list and object are the only non-scalar types supported by Guardrails. |
Supported attributes
Each element can have attributes that specify additional information about the data, such as:
1. name attribute that specifies the name of the field. This will be the key in the output JSON. E.g.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="some_key" />
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_key": "..."
}2. description attribute that specifies the description of the field. This is similar to a prompt that will be provided to the LLM. It can contain more context to help the LLM generate the correct output.required
3. (Coming soon!) attribute that specifies whether the field is required or not. If the field is required, the LLM will be asked to generate the field until it is generated correctly. If the field is not required, the LLM will not be asked to generate the field if it is not generated correctly.validators
4. attribute that specifies the quality criteria that the field should respect. The format attribute can contain multiple quality criteria separated by a colon (;). For example, guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words.on-fail-{quality-criteria}
5. attribute that specifies the corrective action to take in case the quality criteria is not met. For example, on-fail-two-words="reask" specifies that if the field does not have two words, the LLM should be asked to re-generate the field.
E.g.,
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string
name="some_key"
description="Detailed description of what the value of the key should be"
required="true"
validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words"
on-fail-guardrails_two_words="reask"
on-fail-guardrails_uppercase="noop"
/>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_key": "SOME STRING"
}🍀 Specifying quality criteria
The format attribute allows specifying the quality criteria for each field in the expected output. The format attribute can contain multiple quality criteria separated by a colon (;). For example,
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string
name="text"
description="The generated text"
validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words"
on-fail-guardrails_two_words="reask"
/>
</output>
</rail>The above example specifies that the text field should be a string with two words and the text should be returned in upper case.
Quality criteria under the hood
Under the hood, the format attribute is parsed into a list of quality criteria.
Each quality criteria is backed by a Validator class that checks if the generated output meets the quality criteria. For example, the two-words quality criteria is backed by the TwoWords class, which checks if the generated output has two words.
Each quality criteria is then checked against the generated output. If the quality criteria is not met, the corrective action specified by the on-fail-{quality-criteria} attribute is taken.
Supported criteria
- Each quality critera is relevant to a specific data type. For example, the two-words quality criteria is only relevant to strings, and the positive quality criteria is only relevant to integers and floats.
- To see the full list of supported quality criteria, check out the Validation page.
🛠️ Specifying corrective actions
The on-fail-{quality-criteria} attribute allows specifying the corrective action that should be taken if the quality criteria is not met. The corrective action can be one of the following:
| Action | Behavior |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| reask | Reask the LLM to generate an output that meets the quality criteria. The prompt used for reasking contains information about which quality criteria failed, which is auto-generated by the validator. |fix
| | Programmatically fix the generated output to meet the quality criteria. E.g. for the formatter two-words, the programatic fix simply takes the first 2 words of the generated string. |filter
| | Filter the incorrect value. This only filters the field that fails, and will return the rest of the generated output. |refrain
| | Refrain from returning an output. If a formatter has the corrective action refrain, then on failure there will be a None output returned instead of the JSON. |noop
| | Do nothing. The failure will still be recorded in the logs, but no corrective action will be taken. |exception
| | Raise an exception when validation fails. |fix_reask
| | First, fix the generated output deterministically, and then rerun validation with the deterministically fixed output. If validation fails, then perform reasking. |
🚒 Adding compiled output element to prompt
In order to generate the correct LLM output, the output schema needs to be compiled and added to the prompt. This is handled automatically by the Guardrails library.
The output element can be compiled into different formats to be used in the prompt. Currently, only a passthrough compilation into XML is supported, but in the future we will support additional compilation formats like TypeScript.
Passthrough (XML) compilation
By default, the output element will be compiled into XML and added to the prompt. Compilation into XML involves removing any on-fail-{quality-criteria} attributes, and adding the output element to the prompt.
An example of the compiled output element:
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string
name="text"
description="The generated text"
validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words"
/>
</output>
</rail>=== "Compiled XML added to prompt"
<output>
<string
name="text"
description="The generated text"
/>
</output>TypeScript Compilation
Coming soon!
❓ Unsupported tags and attributes
- By default, Guardrails will not throw an error if you add an unsupported type, attribute or quality criteria. Instead, it will treat the unsupported type as a string, and will not perform any quality checks on the field. Often, LLMs will generate a string for an unsupported type, so this behavior is useful.
- Unsupported tags and attributes will still be included in the output schema definition that is appended to the prompt.
- This behavior can be changed by setting the strict attribute of the <output> element to true. If strict is set to true, Guardrails will throw an error if you add an unsupported type, attribute or quality criteria.
<rail version="0.1">
<output strict="true">
<unsupported-type ... />
</output>
</rail>This will throw an error:
❌ Error: Unsupported type: unsupported-type---
How To Guides/Rail
Use Guardrails via RAIL
What is RAIL?
.RAIL is a dialect of XML. It stands for "Reliable AI markup Language", and it can be used to define:
1. The structure of the expected outcome of the LLM. (E.g. JSON)
2. The type of each field in the expected outcome. (E.g. string, integer, list, object)
3. The quality criteria for the expected outcome to be considered valid. (E.g. generated text should be bias-free, generated code should be bug-free)
4. The corrective action to take in case the quality criteria is not met. (E.g. reask the question, filter the LLM, progrmatically fix, etc.)
<details>
<summary>Expand to see an example of a RAIL specification.</summary>
<rail version="0.1"><output>
<list name="fees" description="What fees and charges are associated with my account?">
<object>
<integer name="index" format="1-indexed" />
<string name="name" format="lower-case; two-words" on-fail-lower-case="noop" on-fail-two-words="reask"/>
<string name="explanation" format="one-line" on-fail-one-line="noop" />
<float name="value" format="percentage"/>
</object>
</list>
<string name='interest_rates' description='What are the interest rates offered by the bank on savings and checking accounts, loans, and credit products?' format="one-line" on-fail-one-line="noop"/>
</output>
<prompt>
Given the following document, answer the following questions. If the answer doesn't exist in the document, enter 'None'.
${document}
${gr.xml_prefix_prompt}
${output_schema}
${gr.json_suffix_prompt}</prompt>
</rail>
</details>
Why RAIL?
1. Language agnostic: RAIL Specifications can be enforced in any language.RAIL
2. Simple and familiar: should be familiar to anyone familiar with HTML, and should be easy to learn.RAIL
3. Validation and correction: can be used to define quality criteria for the expected output, and corrective actions to take in case the quality criteria is not met.RAIL
4. Can define complex structures: can be used to define arbitrarily complex structures, such as nested lists, nested objects, etc.RAIL
5. Code assistance: In the future, we plan to support code completion and IntelliSense for specifications, which will make it very easy to write RAIL specifications.
Design inspiration
- HTML, CSS and Javascript: RAIL spec is a dialect of XML, and so is similar to HTML. Specifying quality criteria is done via the format attribute, which is similar to CSS style tags. Corrective actions are specified via the on-fail-* attributes, which is similar to Javascript event handlers.
- OpenAPI as an open standard for creating machine-readable RESTful APIs.
Components of an RAIL Specification
The RAIL specification contains 2 main components:
1. Output: Contains information about the expected output of the LLM. It contains the spec for the overall structure of the LLM output, type info for each field, and the quality criteria for each field and the corrective action to be taken in case quality criteria is not met.RAIL
This is the main component of the specification, which enforces the guarantees that the LLM should provide.Messages
Check out the RAIL Output page for more details, including the full specifcation of how to create complex output schemas.
2. : Prompt template, and contains the high level instructions that are sent to the LLM. Check out the RAIL Messages page for more details.
Let's see an example of an RAIL specification in action:
<rail version="0.1"><output>
...
</output>
<messages>
<message role="user">
...
</message>
</message>
</rail>
1. The output element contains the structure of the expected output of the LLM. It contains the spec for the overall structure of the LLM output, type info for each field, and the quality criteria for each field and the corrective action to be taken in case quality criteria is not met.messages
2. The element contains the high level instructions that are sent to the LLM. Check out the RAIL Prompt page for more details.
📖 How to use RAIL in Guardrails?
After creating a RAIL specification, you can use it to get corrected output from LLMs by wrapping your LLM API call with a Guard module. Here's an example of doing that:
import guardrails as gdCreate a Guard object
guard = gd.Guard.for_rail('path/to/rail/spec.xml') # (1)!
_, validated_output, *rest = guard(
openai.Completion.create, # (2)!
prompt_args,
*args,
kwargs
)1. A Guard object is created from a RAIL specification. This object manages the validation and correction of the output of the LLM, as well as the prompt that is sent to the LLM.openai.Completion.create
2. Wrap the LLM API call () with the Guard object, and add any additional arguments that you want to pass to the LLM API call. Instead of returning the raw text object, the Guard object will return a JSON object that is validated and corrected according to the RAIL specification.
Messages Element
The <messages></messages> element contains instructions and the query that describes the high level task.
📚 Components of a Prompt Element
In addition to the high level task description, messages also contains the following:
| Component | Syntax | Description |
|-------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Variables | ${variable_name} | These are provided by the user at runtime, and substituted in the prompt. |${output_schema}
| Output Schema | | This is the schema of the expected output, and is compiled based on the output element. For more information on how the output schema is compiled for the prompt, check out output element compilation. |${gr.prompt_primitive_name}
| Prompt Primitives | | These are pre-constructed prompts that are useful for common tasks. E.g., some primitives may contain information that helps the LLM understand the output schema better. To see the full list of prompt primitives, check out guardrails/constants.xml. |
<rail version="0.1">
<messages>
<message role="system">You are a helpful assistant only capable of communicating with valid JSON, and no other text.
</message>
<message role="user">
Given the following document, answer the following questions. If the answer doesn't exist in the document, enter 'None'.
${document}
${gr.xml_prefix_prompt}
${output_schema}
${gr.json_suffix_prompt}
</message>
</message>
</rail>
1. The instructions element contains high level background information for the LLM containing textual context and constraints.
2. The prompt contains high level task information.
3. The variable ${document} is provided by the user at runtime.${gr.xml_prefix_prompt}
4. is a prompt primitive provided by guardrails. It is equivalent to typing the following lines in the prompt: Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.${output_schema}
5. is the output schema and contains information about , which is compiled based on the output element.${gr.json_suffix_prompt}
6. is a prompt primitive provided by guardrails. It is equivalent to typing the following lines in the prompt:ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary). The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise. If you are unsure anywhere, enter null.
The messages element is made up of message elements with role attributes. Messages with the role system are intended to be system level prompt. Messages with the role assistant are intended to be messages from the llm to be repassed to itself as additional context and history. Messages with role user are input from the user and also convey history of the conversation.
Output Element
The <output>...</output> element of a RAIL spec is used to give precise specification of the expected output of the LLM. It specifies
1. the structure of the expected output (e.g. JSON),
2. the type of each field,
3. the quality criteria for each field to be considered valid (e.g. generated text should be bias-free, generated code should be bug-free), and
4. the corrective action to take in case the quality criteria is not met (e.g. reask the question to the LLM, filter offending values, progrmatically fix, etc.)
Example:
=== "JSON RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="text" description="The generated text" format="two-words" on-fail-two-words="reask"/>
<float name="score" description="The score of the generated text" format="min-val: 0" on-fail-min-val="fix"/>
<object name="metadata" description="The metadata associated with the generated text">
<string name="key_1" description="description of key_1" />
...
</object>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"text": "string output",
"score": 0.0,
"metadata": {
"key_1": "string",
...
}
}=== "String RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output
type="string"
description="The generated text"
format="two-words"
on-fail-two-words="reask"
/>
</rail>=== "Output String"
string output⚡ Specifying output structure
You can combine RAIL elements to create an arbitrarily complex output structure.
Flat JSON output
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="some_key" ..../>
<integer name="some_other_key" ..../>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_key": "string",
"some_other_key": 0
}JSON output with objects
object elements can be used to specify a JSON object, which is a collection of key-value pairs.
- A child of an object element represents a key in the JSON object. The child element can be any RAIL element, including another list or object elements. The value of the key is generated by the LLM based on the info provided by the child element.list
- An object element can have multiple children, each of which can be any RAIL element, including another or object elements.string
- Formatters can be applied to the child elements of an object element. For example, if the child element is a element, the format attribute can be used to specify the quality criteria for the strings in the list.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<object name="some_object">
<string name="some_str_key" description="What should the value for this key represent?" validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words" />
<integer name="some_other_key" description="What should this integer represent?" format="min-val: 0"/>
</object>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_object": {
"some_str_key": "SOME STRING",
"some_other_key": 0
}
}In the above example, "SOME STRING" is the value for the some_str_key key, and is generated based on the name, description and quality criteria provided by the <string name="some_str_key" ... /> element.
!!! note
The object element doesn't need to have children. If child elements are not provided, the LLM will automatically generate keys and values for the object based on the name, description and format attributes of the object element.
Providing child elements is useful when you want to specify the keys and values that the LLM should generate.
JSON output with lists
list elements can be used to specify a list of values.
- Currently, a list element can only contain a single child element. This means that a list can only contain a single type of data. For example, a list can only contain strings, or a list can only contain integers, but a list cannot contain both strings and integers.
- This child element can be any RAIL element, including another list or object elements.name
- The child of a list element doesn't need to have a attribute, since items in a list don't have names.string
- Formatters can be applied to the child element of a list element. For example, if the child element is a element, the validators attribute can be used to specify the quality criteria for the strings in the list.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<list name="some_list" format="min-len: 2">
<string validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words" />
</list>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_list": [
"STRING 1", "STRING 2"
]
}
!!! note
The list element doesn't need to have a child element. If a child element is not provided, the LLM will automatically generate values for the list based on the name, description and format attributes of the list element.
Providing a child element is useful when you want to have more control over the values that the LLM should generate.
String output
Generate simple strings by specifying type="string" in the <output ... /> element.string
All the formatters supported by the element can be used to specify the quality criteria for the generated string.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output
type="string"
format="two-words"
on-fail-two-words="reask"
/>
</rail>=== "Output"
string outputRAIL Elements
At the heart of the RAIL specification is the use of elements. Each element's tag represents a type of data. For example, in the element <string ... />, the tag represents a string, the <integer ... /> elements represents an integer, the <object ...></object> element represents an object, etc.
!!! note
The tag of RAIL element is the same as the "type" of the data it represents.
E.g. <string .../> element will generate a string, <integer .../> element will generate an integer, etc.
Supported types
Guardrails supports all JSON and pydantic compatible datatypes.
#### Scalar vs Non-scalar types
Guardrails supports two types of data types: scalar and non-scalar.
| Scalar | Non Scalar |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Scalar types are void elements, and can't have any child elements. | Non-scalar types can be non-void, and can have closing tags and child elements. |
| Syntax: ` <string ... /> ` | Syntax: `<list ...> <string /> </list>`|string
| Examples: , integer, float, bool, url, email, etc. | Examples: list and object are the only non-scalar types supported by Guardrails. |
Supported attributes
Each element can have attributes that specify additional information about the data, such as:
1. name attribute that specifies the name of the field. This will be the key in the output JSON. E.g.
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="some_key" />
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_key": "..."
}2. description attribute that specifies the description of the field. This is similar to a prompt that will be provided to the LLM. It can contain more context to help the LLM generate the correct output.required
3. (Coming soon!) attribute that specifies whether the field is required or not. If the field is required, the LLM will be asked to generate the field until it is generated correctly. If the field is not required, the LLM will not be asked to generate the field if it is not generated correctly.validators
4. attribute that specifies the quality criteria that the field should respect. The validators attribute can contain multiple quality criteria separated by a colon (;). For example, guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words.on-fail-{quality-criteria}
5. attribute that specifies the corrective action to take in case the quality criteria is not met. For example, on-fail-two-words="reask" specifies that if the field does not have two words, the LLM should be asked to re-generate the field.
E.g.,
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string
name="some_key"
description="Detailed description of what the value of the key should be"
required="true"
validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words"
on-fail-guardrails_two_words="reask"
on-fail-guardrails_uppercase="noop"
/>
</output>
</rail>=== "Output JSON"
{
"some_key": "SOME STRING"
}Specifying quality criteria
The format attribute allows specifying the quality criteria for each field in the expected output. The format attribute can contain multiple quality criteria separated by a colon (;). For example,
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string
name="text"
description="The generated text"
validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words"
on-fail-guardrails_two_words="reask"
on-fail-guardrails_uppercase="noop"
/>
</output>
</rail>The above example specifies that the text field should be a string with two words and the text should be returned in upper case.
Quality criteria under the hood
Under the hood, the format attribute is parsed into a list of quality criteria.
Each quality criteria is backed by a Validator class that checks if the generated output meets the quality criteria. For example, the two-words quality criteria is backed by the TwoWords class, which checks if the generated output has two words.
Each quality criteria is then checked against the generated output. If the quality criteria is not met, the corrective action specified by the on-fail-{quality-criteria} attribute is taken.
Supported criteria
- Each quality critera is relevant to a specific data type. For example, the two-words quality criteria is only relevant to strings, and the positive quality criteria is only relevant to integers and floats.
- To see the full list of supported quality criteria, check out the Validation page.
🛠️ Specifying corrective actions
The on-fail-{quality-criteria} attribute allows specifying the corrective action that should be taken if the quality criteria is not met. The corrective action can be one of the following:
| Action | Behavior |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| reask | Reask the LLM to generate an output that meets the quality criteria. The prompt used for reasking contains information about which quality criteria failed, which is auto-generated by the validator. |fix
| | Programmatically fix the generated output to meet the quality criteria. E.g. for the formatter two-words, the programatic fix simply takes the first 2 words of the generated string. |filter
| | Filter the incorrect value. This only filters the field that fails, and will return the rest of the generated output. |refrain
| | Refrain from returning an output. If a formatter has the corrective action refrain, then on failure there will be a None output returned instead of the JSON. |noop
| | Do nothing. The failure will still be recorded in the logs, but no corrective action will be taken. |exception
| | Raise an exception when validation fails. |fix_reask
| | First, fix the generated output deterministically, and then rerun validation with the deterministically fixed output. If validation fails, then perform reasking. |
Adding compiled output element to prompt
In order to generate the correct LLM output, the output schema needs to be compiled and added to the prompt. This is handled automatically by the Guardrails library.
The output element can be compiled into different formats to be used in the prompt. Currently, only a passthrough compilation into XML is supported, but in the future we will support additional compilation formats like TypeScript.
Passthrough (XML) compilation
By default, the output element will be compiled into XML and added to the prompt. Compilation into XML involves removing any on-fail-{quality-criteria} attributes, and adding the output element to the prompt.
An example of the compiled output element:
=== "RAIL Spec"
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string
name="text"
description="The generated text"
validators="guardrails/uppercase; guardrails/two_words"
/>
</output>
</rail>=== "Compiled XML added to prompt"
<output>
<string
name="text"
description="The generated text"
/>
</output>TypeScript Compilation
Coming soon!
Unsupported tags and attributes
- By default, Guardrails will not throw an error if you add an unsupported type, attribute or quality criteria. Instead, it will treat the unsupported type as a string, and will not perform any quality checks on the field. Often, LLMs will generate a string for an unsupported type, so this behavior is useful.
- Unsupported tags and attributes will still be included in the output schema definition that is appended to the prompt.
- This behavior can be changed by setting the strict attribute of the <output> element to true. If strict is set to true, Guardrails will throw an error if you add an unsupported type, attribute or quality criteria.
<rail version="0.1">
<output strict="true">
<unsupported-type ... />
</output>
</rail>This will throw an error:
❌ Error: Unsupported type: unsupported-type---
Examples/Data/Article1
Section. 1.
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Section. 2.
The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.
When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
---
Examples/Data/Twain
The Humorous Story an American Development.— Its
Difference from Comic and Witty Stories.
DO not claim that I can tell a story as it ought to
be told. I only claim to know how a story
ought to be told, for I have been almost daily in the
company of the most expert story-tellers for many
years.
There are several kinds of stories, but only one
difficult kind —the humorous. I will talk mainly
about that one. The humorous story is American,
the comic story is English, the witty story is French.
The humorous story depends for its effect upon the
manner of the telling; the comic story and the witty
story upon the matter.
The humorous story may be spun out to great
length, and may wander around as much as it
pleases, and arrive nowhere in particular; but the
comic and witty stories must be brief and end with
a point. The humorous story bubbles gently along,
the others burst.
The humorous story is strictly a work of art —
high and delicate art — and only an artist can tell it;
but no art is necessary in telling the comic and the
witty story; anybody can do it. The art of telling
a humorous story — understand, I mean by word of
mouth, not print — was created in America, and
has remained at home.
The humorous story is told gravely; the teller
does his best to conceal the fact that he even dimly
suspects that there is anything funny about it; but
the teller of the comic story tells you beforehand
that it is one of the funniest things he has ever
heard, then tells it with eager delight, and is the
first person to laugh when he gets through. And
sometimes, if he has had good success, he is so glad
and happy that he will repeat the ‘‘ nub’’ of it and
slance around from face to face, collecting applause,
and then repeat it again. It is a pathetic thing to
see.
Very often, of course, the rambling and disjointed
humorous story finishes with a nub, point, snapper,
or whatever you like to call it. Then the listener
must be alert, for in many cases the teller will divert
attention from that nub by dropping it in a carefully.
casual and indifferent way, with the pretence that he
does not know it is a nub.
Artemus Ward used that trick a good deal; then
when the belated audience presently caught the joke
he would look up with innocent surprise, as if
wondering what they had found to laugh at. Dan
Setchell used it before him, Nye and Riley and
others use it to-day.
But the teller of the comic story does not slur
the nub; he shouts it at you—every time. And
when he prints it, in England, France, Germany,
and Italy, he italicizes it, puts some whooping
exclamation-points after it, and sometimes explains
it in a parenthesis. All of which is very depressing,
and makes one want to renounce joking and lead a
better life.
- Mark Twain
---
Api Reference/Actions
Actions
ReAsk
class ReAsk(IReask)Base class for ReAsk objects.
Attributes:
- incorrect_value _Any_ - The value that failed validation.fail_results
- _List[FailResult]_ - The results of the failed validations.
FieldReAsk
class FieldReAsk(ReAsk)An implementation of ReAsk that is used to reask for a specific field.
Inherits from ReAsk.
Attributes:
- path _Optional[List[Any]]_ - a list of keys that
designated the path to the field that failed validation.
SkeletonReAsk
class SkeletonReAsk(ReAsk)An implementation of ReAsk that is used to reask for structured data
when the response does not match the expected schema.
Inherits from ReAsk.
NonParseableReAsk
class NonParseableReAsk(ReAsk)An implementation of ReAsk that is used to reask for structured data
when the response is not parseable as JSON.
Inherits from ReAsk.
Filter
class Filter()#### apply\_filters
def apply_filters(value: Any) -> AnyRecursively filter out any values that are instances of Filter.
Refrain
class Refrain()#### apply\_refrain
def apply_refrain(value: Any, output_type: OutputTypes) -> AnyRecursively check for any values that are instances of Refrain.
If found, return an empty value of the appropriate type.
---
Api Reference/Errors
Errors
ValidationError
class ValidationError(Exception)Top level validation error.
This is thrown from the validation engine when a Validator has
on_fail=OnFailActions.EXCEPTION set and validation fails.
Inherits from Exception.
---
Api Reference/Formatters
Formatters
BaseFormatter
class BaseFormatter(ABC)A Formatter takes an LLM Callable and wraps the method into an abstract
callable.
Used to perform manipulations of the input or the output, like JSON
constrained- decoding.
JsonFormatter
class JsonFormatter(BaseFormatter)A formatter that uses Jsonformer to ensure the shape of structured data
for Hugging Face models.
---
Api Reference/Generics And Base Classes
Generics And Base Classes
ArbitraryModel
class ArbitraryModel(BaseModel)Empty Pydantic model with a config that allows arbitrary types.
Stack
class Stack(List[T])#### empty
def empty() -> boolTests if this stack is empty.
#### peek
def peek() -> Optional[T]Looks at the object at the top (last/most recently added) of this
stack without removing it from the stack.
#### pop
def pop() -> Optional[T]Removes the object at the top of this stack and returns that object
as the value of this function.
#### push
def push(item: T) -> NonePushes an item onto the top of this stack.
Proxy of List.append
Limits Stack Length to _max_length entries
#### search
def search(x: T) -> Optional[int]Returns the 0-based position of the last item whose value is equal
to x on this stack.
We deviate from the typical 1-based position used by Stack
classes (i.e. Java) because most python users (and developers in
general) are accustomed to 0-based indexing.
#### at
def at(index: int, default: Optional[T] = None) -> Optional[T]Returns the item located at the index.
If the index does not exist in the stack (Overflow or
Underflow), None is returned instead.
#### copy
def copy() -> "Stack[T]"Returns a copy of the current Stack.
#### first
@property
def first() -> Optional[T]Returns the first item of the stack without removing it.
Same as Stack.bottom.
#### last
@property
def last() -> Optional[T]Returns the last item of the stack without removing it.
Same as Stack.top.
#### bottom
@property
def bottom() -> Optional[T]Returns the item on the bottom of the stack without removing it.
Same as Stack.first.
#### top
@property
def top() -> Optional[T]Returns the item on the top of the stack without removing it.
Same as Stack.last.
#### length
@property
def length() -> intReturns the number of items in the Stack.
---
Api Reference/Guards
Guards
Guard
class Guard(IGuard, Generic[OT])The Guard class.
This class is the main entry point for using Guardrails. It can be
initialized by one of the following patterns:
- Guard().use(...)Guard.for_string(...)
- Guard.for_pydantic(...)
- Guard.for_rail(...)
- Guard.for_rail_string(...)
-
The __call__
method functions as a wrapper around LLM APIs. It takes in an LLM
API, and optional prompt parameters, and returns a ValidationOutcome
class that contains the raw output from
the LLM, the validated output, as well as other helpful information.
#### \_\_init\_\_
def __init__(*,
id: Optional[str] = None,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None,
validators: Optional[List[ValidatorReference]] = None,
output_schema: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
base_url: Optional[str] = None,
api_key: Optional[str] = None,
history_max_length: Optional[int] = None,
use_server: Optional[bool] = None)Initialize the Guard with serialized validator references and an
output schema.
Output schema must be a valid JSON Schema.
#### configure
def configure(*,
num_reasks: Optional[int] = None,
allow_metrics_collection: Optional[bool] = None)Configure the Guard.
Arguments:
- num_reasks _int, optional_ - The max times to re-ask the LLMallow_metrics_collection
if validation fails. Defaults to None.
- _bool, optional_ - Whether to allowguardrails configure
Guardrails to collect anonymous metrics.
Defaults to None, and falls back to waht is
set via the command.
#### for\_rail
@classmethod
def for_rail(cls,
rail_file: str,
*,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None)Create a Guard using a .rail file to specify the output schema,
prompt, etc.
Arguments:
- rail_file - The path to the .rail file.name
- _str, optional_ - A unique name for this Guard. Defaults to gr- + the object id.description
- _str, optional_ - A description for this Guard. Defaults to None.
Returns:
An instance of the Guard class.
#### for\_rail\_string
@classmethod
def for_rail_string(cls,
rail_string: str,
*,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None)Create a Guard using a .rail string to specify the output schema,
prompt, etc..
Arguments:
- rail_string - The .rail string.name
- _str, optional_ - A unique name for this Guard. Defaults to gr- + the object id.description
- _str, optional_ - A description for this Guard. Defaults to None.
Returns:
An instance of the Guard class.
#### for\_pydantic
@classmethod
def for_pydantic(cls,
output_class: ModelOrListOfModels,
*,
reask_messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None,
output_formatter: Optional[Union[str, BaseFormatter]] = None)Create a Guard instance using a Pydantic model to specify the output
schema.
Arguments:
- output_class - (Union[Type[BaseModel], List[Type[BaseModel]]]): The pydantic model that describesmessages
the desired structure of the output.
- _List[Dict], optional_ - A list of messages to give to the llm. Defaults to None.reask_messages
- _List[Dict], optional_ - A list of messages to use during reasks. Defaults to None.name
- _str, optional_ - A unique name for this Guard. Defaults to gr- + the object id.description
- _str, optional_ - A description for this Guard. Defaults to None.output_formatter
- _str | Formatter, optional_ - 'none' (default), 'jsonformer', or a Guardrails Formatter.
#### for\_string
@classmethod
def for_string(cls,
validators: Sequence[Validator],
*,
string_description: Optional[str] = None,
reask_messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None)Create a Guard instance for a string response.
Arguments:
- validators - (List[Validator]): The list of validators to apply to the string output.string_description
- _str, optional_ - A description for the string to be generated. Defaults to None.messages
- _List[Dict], optional_ - A list of messages to pass to llm. Defaults to None.reask_messages
- _List[Dict], optional_ - A list of messages to use during reasks. Defaults to None.name
- _str, optional_ - A unique name for this Guard. Defaults to gr- + the object id.description
- _str, optional_ - A description for this Guard. Defaults to None.
#### \_\_call\_\_
@trace(name="/guard_call", origin="Guard.__call__")
def __call__(
llm_api: Optional[Callable] = None,
*args,
prompt_params: Optional[Dict] = None,
num_reasks: Optional[int] = 1,
messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
metadata: Optional[Dict] = None,
full_schema_reask: Optional[bool] = None,
kwargs
) -> Union[ValidationOutcome[OT], Iterator[ValidationOutcome[OT]]]Call the LLM and validate the output.
Arguments:
- llm_api - The LLM API to callprompt_params
(e.g. openai.completions.create or openai.Completion.acreate)
- - The parameters to pass to the prompt.format() method.num_reasks
- - The max times to re-ask the LLM for invalid output.messages
- - The message history to pass to the LLM.metadata
- - Metadata to pass to the validators.full_schema_reask
- - When reasking, whether to regenerate the full schemaTrue
or just the incorrect values.
Defaults to if a base model is provided,False
otherwise.
Returns:
ValidationOutcome
#### parse
@trace(name="/guard_call", origin="Guard.parse")
def parse(llm_output: str,
*args,
metadata: Optional[Dict] = None,
llm_api: Optional[Callable] = None,
num_reasks: Optional[int] = None,
prompt_params: Optional[Dict] = None,
full_schema_reask: Optional[bool] = None,
kwargs) -> ValidationOutcome[OT]Alternate flow to using Guard where the llm_output is known.
Arguments:
- llm_output - The output being parsed and validated.metadata
- - Metadata to pass to the validators.llm_api
- - The LLM API to callnum_reasks
(e.g. openai.completions.create or openai.Completion.acreate)
- - The max times to re-ask the LLM for invalid output.prompt_params
- - The parameters to pass to the prompt.format() method.full_schema_reask
- - When reasking, whether to regenerate the full schema
or just the incorrect values.
Returns:
ValidationOutcome
#### error\_spans\_in\_output
def error_spans_in_output() -> List[ErrorSpan]Get the error spans in the last output.
#### use
def use(*validator_spread: Validator,
validators: List[Validator] = [],
on: str = "output") -> "Guard"Applies validators to the property specified in the on argument.Guard.use
Calling with the same on value multiple times will
overwrite previously configured validators on the specified property.
Arguments:
*validator_spread:
One or more validators passed as positional arguments to use.
validators:
Keyword argument that allows explicitly setting a list of
validators to use.
on:
The property to validate. Valid options include "output", "messages",
or a JSON path starting with "$.". Defaults to "output".
#### get\_validators
def get_validators(on: str) -> List[Validator]The read-only counterpart to Guard.use. Retrieves the validators
applied to the specified property.
Arguments:
- on - The property for which to return configured validators.
Valid options include "output", "messages",
or a JSON path starting with "$.".
#### validate
@trace(name="/guard_call", origin="Guard.validate")
def validate(llm_output: str, args, *kwargs) -> ValidationOutcome[OT]#### to\_runnable
def to_runnable() -> RunnableConvert a Guard to a LangChain Runnable.
#### to\_dict
def to_dict() -> Dict[str, Any]#### json\_function\_calling\_tool
def json_function_calling_tool(
tools: Optional[list] = None) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]Appends an OpenAI tool that specifies the output structure using
JSON Schema for chat models.
#### from\_dict
@classmethod
def from_dict(cls, obj: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional["Guard"]AsyncGuard
class AsyncGuard(Guard, Generic[OT])The AsyncGuard class.
This class one of the main entry point for using Guardrails. It is
initialized from one of the following class methods:
- for_railfor_rail_string
- for_pydantic
- for_string
-
The __call__
method functions as a wrapper around LLM APIs. It takes in an Async LLM
API, and optional prompt parameters, and returns the raw output stream from
the LLM and the validated output stream.
#### \_\_init\_\_
def __init__(args, *kwargs)#### for\_pydantic
@classmethod
def for_pydantic(cls,
output_class: ModelOrListOfModels,
*,
messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
reask_messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None,
output_formatter: Optional[Union[str, BaseFormatter]] = None)#### for\_string
@classmethod
def for_string(cls,
validators: Sequence[Validator],
*,
string_description: Optional[str] = None,
messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
reask_messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
name: Optional[str] = None,
description: Optional[str] = None)#### from\_dict
@classmethod
def from_dict(cls, obj: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional["AsyncGuard"]#### use
def use(*validator_spread: Validator,
validators: List[Validator] = [],
on: str = "output") -> "AsyncGuard"#### \_\_call\_\_
@async_trace(name="/guard_call", origin="AsyncGuard.__call__")
async def __call__(
llm_api: Optional[Callable[..., Awaitable[Any]]] = None,
*args,
prompt_params: Optional[Dict] = None,
num_reasks: Optional[int] = 1,
messages: Optional[List[Dict]] = None,
metadata: Optional[Dict] = None,
full_schema_reask: Optional[bool] = None,
kwargs
) -> Union[
ValidationOutcome[OT],
Awaitable[ValidationOutcome[OT]],
AsyncIterator[ValidationOutcome[OT]],
]Call the LLM and validate the output. Pass an async LLM API to
return a coroutine.
Arguments:
- llm_api - The LLM API to callprompt_params
(e.g. openai.completions.create or openai.chat.completions.create)
- - The parameters to pass to the prompt.format() method.num_reasks
- - The max times to re-ask the LLM for invalid output.messages
- - The message history to pass to the LLM.metadata
- - Metadata to pass to the validators.full_schema_reask
- - When reasking, whether to regenerate the full schemaTrue
or just the incorrect values.
Defaults to if a base model is provided,False
otherwise.
Returns:
The raw text output from the LLM and the validated output.
#### parse
@async_trace(name="/guard_call", origin="AsyncGuard.parse")
async def parse(llm_output: str,
*args,
metadata: Optional[Dict] = None,
llm_api: Optional[Callable[..., Awaitable[Any]]] = None,
num_reasks: Optional[int] = None,
prompt_params: Optional[Dict] = None,
full_schema_reask: Optional[bool] = None,
kwargs) -> Awaitable[ValidationOutcome[OT]]Alternate flow to using AsyncGuard where the llm_output is known.
Arguments:
- llm_output - The output being parsed and validated.metadata
- - Metadata to pass to the validators.llm_api
- - The LLM API to callnum_reasks
(e.g. openai.completions.create or openai.Completion.acreate)
- - The max times to re-ask the LLM for invalid output.prompt_params
- - The parameters to pass to the prompt.format() method.full_schema_reask
- - When reasking, whether to regenerate the full schema
or just the incorrect values.
Returns:
The validated response. This is either a string or a dictionary,
determined by the object schema defined in the RAILspec.
#### validate
@async_trace(name="/guard_call", origin="AsyncGuard.validate")
async def validate(llm_output: str, *args,
kwargs) -> Awaitable[ValidationOutcome[OT]]ValidationOutcome
class ValidationOutcome(IValidationOutcome, ArbitraryModel, Generic[OT])The final output from a Guard execution.
Attributes:
- call_id - The id of the Call that produced this ValidationOutcome.raw_llm_output
- - The raw, unchanged output from the LLM call.validated_output
- - The validated, and potentially fixed, output from the LLM callreask
after passing through validation.
- - If validation continuously fails and all allocated reasks are used,validation_passed
this field will contain the final reask that would have been sent
to the LLM if additional reasks were available.
- - A boolean to indicate whether or not the LLM outputerror
passed validation. If this is False, the validated_output may be invalid.
- - If the validation failed, this field will contain the error message
#### from\_guard\_history
@classmethod
def from_guard_history(cls, call: Call)Create a ValidationOutcome from a history Call object.
---
Api Reference/History And Logs
History and Logs
Call
class Call(ICall, ArbitraryModel)A Call represents a single execution of a Guard. One Call is created
each time the user invokes the Guard.__call__, Guard.parse, orGuard.validate method.
Attributes:
- iterations _Stack[Iteration]_ - A stack of iterationsinputs
for the initial validation round
and one for each reask that occurs during a Call.
- _CallInputs_ - The inputs as passed in toGuard.__call__
, Guard.parse, or Guard.validateexception
- _Optional[Exception]_ - The exception that interrupted
the Guard execution.
#### prompt\_params
@property
def prompt_params() -> Optional[Dict]The prompt parameters as provided by the user when initializing or
calling the Guard.
#### messages
@property
def messages() -> Optional[Union[Messages, list[dict[str, str]]]]The messages as provided by the user when initializing or calling
the Guard.
#### compiled\_messages
@property
def compiled_messages() -> Optional[list[dict[str, str]]]The initial compiled messages that were passed to the LLM on the
first call.
#### reask\_messages
@property
def reask_messages() -> Stack[Messages]The compiled messages used during reasks.
Does not include the initial messages.
#### logs
@property
def logs() -> Stack[str]Returns all logs from all iterations as a stack.
#### tokens\_consumed
@property
def tokens_consumed() -> Optional[int]Returns the total number of tokens consumed during all iterations
with this call.
#### prompt\_tokens\_consumed
@property
def prompt_tokens_consumed() -> Optional[int]Returns the total number of prompt tokens consumed during all
iterations with this call.
#### completion\_tokens\_consumed
@property
def completion_tokens_consumed() -> Optional[int]Returns the total number of completion tokens consumed during all
iterations with this call.
#### raw\_outputs
@property
def raw_outputs() -> Stack[str]The exact outputs from all LLM calls.
#### parsed\_outputs
@property
def parsed_outputs() -> Stack[Union[str, List, Dict]]The outputs from the LLM after undergoing parsing but before
validation.
#### validation\_response
@property
def validation_response() -> Optional[Union[str, List, Dict, ReAsk]]The aggregated responses from the validation process across all
iterations within the current call.
This value could contain ReAsks.
#### fixed\_output
@property
def fixed_output() -> Optional[Union[str, List, Dict]]The cumulative output from the validation process across all current
iterations with any automatic fixes applied.
Could still contain ReAsks if a fix was not available.
#### guarded\_output
@property
def guarded_output() -> Optional[Union[str, List, Dict]]The complete validated output after all stages of validation are
completed.
This property contains the aggregate validated output after all
validation stages have been completed. Some values in the
validated output may be "fixed" values that were corrected
during validation.
This will only have a value if the Guard is in a passing state
OR if the action is no-op.
#### reasks
@property
def reasks() -> Stack[ReAsk]Reasks generated during validation that could not be automatically
fixed.
These would be incorporated into the prompt for the next LLM
call if additional reasks were granted.
#### validator\_logs
@property
def validator_logs() -> Stack[ValidatorLogs]The results of each individual validation performed on the LLM
responses during all iterations.
#### error
@property
def error() -> Optional[str]The error message from any exception that raised and interrupted the
run.
#### failed\_validations
@property
def failed_validations() -> Stack[ValidatorLogs]The validator logs for any validations that failed during the
entirety of the run.
#### status
@property
def status() -> strReturns the cumulative status of the run based on the validity of
the final merged output.
#### tree
@property
def tree() -> TreeReturns the tree.
Iteration
class Iteration(IIteration, ArbitraryModel)An Iteration represents a single iteration of the validation loop
including a single call to the LLM if applicable.
Attributes:
- id _str_ - The unique identifier for the iteration.call_id
- _str_ - The unique identifier for the Callindex
that this iteration is a part of.
- _int_ - The index of this iteration within the Call.inputs
- _Inputs_ - The inputs for the validation loop.outputs
- _Outputs_ - The outputs from the validation loop.
#### logs
@property
def logs() -> Stack[str]Returns the logs from this iteration as a stack.
#### tokens\_consumed
@property
def tokens_consumed() -> Optional[int]Returns the total number of tokens consumed during this
iteration.
#### prompt\_tokens\_consumed
@property
def prompt_tokens_consumed() -> Optional[int]Returns the number of prompt/input tokens consumed during this
iteration.
#### completion\_tokens\_consumed
@property
def completion_tokens_consumed() -> Optional[int]Returns the number of completion/output tokens consumed during this
iteration.
#### raw\_output
@property
def raw_output() -> Optional[str]The exact output from the LLM.
#### parsed\_output
@property
def parsed_output() -> Optional[Union[str, List, Dict]]The output from the LLM after undergoing parsing but before
validation.
#### validation\_response
@property
def validation_response() -> Optional[Union[ReAsk, str, List, Dict]]The response from a single stage of validation.
Validation response is the output of a single stage of validation
and could be a combination of valid output and reasks.
Note that a Guard may run validation multiple times if reasks occur.
To access the final output after all steps of validation are completed,
check out Call.guarded_output."
#### guarded\_output
@property
def guarded_output() -> Optional[Union[str, List, Dict]]Any valid values after undergoing validation.
Some values in the validated output may be "fixed" values that
were corrected during validation. This property may be a partial
structure if field level reasks occur.
#### reasks
@property
def reasks() -> Sequence[ReAsk]Reasks generated during validation.
These would be incorporated into the prompt or the next LLM
call.
#### validator\_logs
@property
def validator_logs() -> List[ValidatorLogs]The results of each individual validation performed on the LLM
response during this iteration.
#### error
@property
def error() -> Optional[str]The error message from any exception that raised and interrupted
this iteration.
#### exception
@property
def exception() -> Optional[Exception]The exception that interrupted this iteration.
#### failed\_validations
@property
def failed_validations() -> List[ValidatorLogs]The validator logs for any validations that failed during this
iteration.
#### error\_spans\_in\_output
@property
def error_spans_in_output() -> List[ErrorSpan]The error spans from the LLM response.
These indices are relative to the complete LLM output.
#### status
@property
def status() -> strRepresentation of the end state of this iteration.
OneOf: pass, fail, error, not run
Inputs
class Inputs(IInputs, ArbitraryModel)Inputs represent the input data that is passed into the validation loop.
Attributes:
- llm_api _Optional[PromptCallableBase]_ - The constructed classllm_output
for calling the LLM.
- _Optional[str]_ - The string output from anmessages
external LLM call provided by the user via Guard.parse.
- _Optional[List[Dict]]_ - The message historyprompt_params
provided by the user for chat model calls.
- _Optional[Dict]_ - The parameters providednum_reasks
by the user that will be formatted into the final LLM prompt.
- _Optional[int]_ - The total number of reasks allowed;metadata
user provided or defaulted.
- _Optional[Dict[str, Any]]_ - The metadata providedfull_schema_reask
by the user to be used during validation.
- _Optional[bool]_ - Whether reasks westream
performed across the entire schema or at the field level.
- _Optional[bool]_ - Whether or not streaming was used.
Outputs
class Outputs(IOutputs, ArbitraryModel)Outputs represent the data that is output from the validation loop.
Attributes:
- llm_response_info _Optional[LLMResponse]_ - Information from the LLM responseraw_output
- _Optional[str]_ - The exact output from the LLM.parsed_output
- _Optional[Union[str, List, Dict]]_ - The output parsed from the LLMvalidation_response
response as it was passed into validation.
- _Optional[Union[str, ReAsk, List, Dict]]_ - The responseguarded_output
from the validation process.
- _Optional[Union[str, List, Dict]]_ - Any valid values afterreasks
undergoing validation.
Some values may be "fixed" values that were corrected during validation.
This property may be a partial structure if field level reasks occur.
- _List[ReAsk]_ - Information from the validation process used to constructvalidator_logs
a ReAsk to the LLM on validation failure. Default [].
- _List[ValidatorLogs]_ - The results of each individualerror
validation. Default [].
- _Optional[str]_ - The error message from any exception that raisedexception
and interrupted the process.
- _Optional[Exception]_ - The exception that interrupted the process.
#### failed\_validations
@property
def failed_validations() -> List[ValidatorLogs]Returns the validator logs for any validation that failed.
#### error\_spans\_in\_output
@property
def error_spans_in_output() -> List[ErrorSpan]The error spans from the LLM response.
These indices are relative to the complete LLM output.
#### status
@property
def status() -> strRepresentation of the end state of the validation run.
OneOf: pass, fail, error, not run
CallInputs
class CallInputs(Inputs, ICallInputs, ArbitraryModel)CallInputs represent the input data that is passed into the Guard from
the user. Inherits from Inputs with the below overrides and additional
attributes.
Attributes:
- llm_api _Optional[Callable[[Any], Awaitable[Any]]]_ - The LLM functionmessages
provided by the user during Guard.__call__ or Guard.parse.
- _Optional[dict[str, str]]_ - The messages as provided by the user.args
- _List[Any]_ - Additional arguments for the LLM as provided by the user.kwargs
Default [].
- _Dict[str, Any]_ - Additional keyword-arguments for
the LLM as provided by the user. Default {}.
---
Api Reference/Llm Interaction
Helpers for LLM Interactions
Class for representing a prompt entry.
BasePrompt
class BasePrompt()Base class for representing an LLM prompt.
#### \_\_init\_\_
def __init__(source: str,
output_schema: Optional[str] = None,
*,
xml_output_schema: Optional[str] = None)Initialize and substitute constants in the prompt.
#### substitute\_constants
def substitute_constants(text: str) -> strSubstitute constants in the prompt.
#### get\_prompt\_variables
def get_prompt_variables() -> List[str]#### format
def format(kwargs) -> "BasePrompt"#### escape
def escape() -> strEscape single curly braces into double curly braces.
The LLM prompt.
Prompt
class Prompt(BasePrompt)Prompt class.
The prompt is passed to the LLM as primary instructions.
#### format
def format(kwargs) -> "Prompt"Format the prompt using the given keyword arguments.
Instructions to the LLM, to be passed in the prompt.
Instructions
class Instructions(BasePrompt)Instructions class.
The instructions are passed to the LLM as secondary input. Different
model may use these differently. For example, chat models may
receive instructions in the system-prompt.
#### format
def format(kwargs) -> "Instructions"Format the prompt using the given keyword arguments.
PromptCallableBase
LLMResponse
class LLMResponse(ILLMResponse)Standard information collection from LLM responses to feed the
validation loop.
Attributes:
- output _str_ - The output from the LLM.stream_output
- _Optional[Iterator]_ - A stream of output from the LLM.async_stream_output
Default None.
- _Optional[AsyncIterator]_ - An async stream of outputprompt_token_count
from the LLM. Default None.
- _Optional[int]_ - The number of tokens in the prompt.response_token_count
Default None.
- _Optional[int]_ - The number of tokens in the response.
Default None.
---
Api Reference/Types
Types
OnFailAction
class OnFailAction(str, Enum)OnFailAction is an Enum that represents the different actions that can
be taken when a validation fails.
Attributes:
- REASK _Literal["reask"]_ - On failure, Reask the LLM.FIX
- _Literal["fix"]_ - On failure, apply a static fix.FILTER
- _Literal["filter"]_ - On failure, filter out the invalid values.REFRAIN
- _Literal["refrain"]_ - On failure, refrain from responding;NOOP
return an empty value.
- _Literal["noop"]_ - On failure, do nothing.EXCEPTION
- _Literal["exception"]_ - On failure, raise a ValidationError.FIX_REASK
- _Literal["fix_reask"]_ - On failure, apply a static fix,CUSTOM
check if the fixed value passed validation, if not then reask the LLM.
- _Literal["custom"]_ - On failure, call a custom function with the
invalid value and the FailResult's from any validators run on the value.
RailTypes
class RailTypes(str, Enum)RailTypes is an Enum that represents the builtin tags for RAIL xml.
Attributes:
- STRING _Literal["string"]_ - A string value.INTEGER
- _Literal["integer"]_ - An integer value.FLOAT
- _Literal["float"]_ - A float value.BOOL
- _Literal["bool"]_ - A boolean value.DATE
- _Literal["date"]_ - A date value.TIME
- _Literal["time"]_ - A time value.PERCENTAGE
DATETIME (Literal["date-time: - A datetime value.
- _Literal["percentage"]_ - A percentage value represented as a string.ENUM
Example "20.5%".
- _Literal["enum"]_ - An enum value.LIST
- _Literal["list"]_ - A list/array value.OBJECT
- _Literal["object"]_ - An object/dictionary value.CHOICE
- _Literal["choice"]_ - The options for a discrimated union.CASE
- _Literal["case"]_ - A dictionary that contains a discrimated union.
MessageHistory
MessageHistory = List[Dict[str, Union[Prompt, str]]]ModelOrListOfModels
ModelOrListOfModels = Union[Type[BaseModel], Type[List[Type[BaseModel]]]]ModelOrListOrDict
ModelOrListOrDict = Union[Type[BaseModel], Type[List[Type[BaseModel]]],
Type[Dict[str, Type[BaseModel]]]]ModelOrModelUnion
ModelOrModelUnion = Union[Type[BaseModel], Union[Type[BaseModel], Any]]PydanticValidatorTuple
PydanticValidatorTuple = Tuple[Union[Validator, str, Callable], str]PydanticValidatorSpec
PydanticValidatorSpec = Union[Validator, PydanticValidatorTuple]UseValidatorSpec
UseValidatorSpec = Union[Validator, Type[Validator]]UseManyValidatorTuple
UseManyValidatorTuple = Tuple[
Type[Validator],
Optional[Union[List[Any], Dict[str, Any]]],
Optional[Dict[str, Any]],
]UseManyValidatorSpec
UseManyValidatorSpec = Union[Validator, UseManyValidatorTuple]ValidatorMap
ValidatorMap = Dict[str, List[Validator]]---
Api Reference/Validator
Validation
Validator
@dataclass
class Validator()Base class for validators.
#### \_\_init\_\_
def __init__(on_fail: Optional[Union[Callable[[Any, FailResult], Any],
OnFailAction]] = None,
kwargs)#### validate
def validate(value: Any, metadata: Dict[str, Any]) -> ValidationResultDo not override this function, instead implement _validate().
External facing validate function. This function acts as a
wrapper for _validate() and is intended to apply any meta-
validation requirements, logic, or pre/post processing.
#### validate\_stream
def validate_stream(chunk: Any,
metadata: Dict[str, Any],
*,
property_path: Optional[str] = "$",
context_vars: Optional[ContextVar[Dict[
str, ContextVar[List[str]]]]] = None,
context: Optional[Context] = None,
kwargs) -> Optional[ValidationResult]Validates a chunk emitted by an LLM. If the LLM chunk is smaller
than the validator's chunking strategy, it will be accumulated until it
reaches the desired size. In the meantime, the validator will return
None.
If the LLM chunk is larger than the validator's chunking
strategy, it will split it into validator-sized chunks and
validate each one, returning an array of validation results.
Otherwise, the validator will validate the chunk and return the
result.
#### with\_metadata
def with_metadata(metadata: Dict[str, Any])Assigns metadata to this validator to use during validation.
#### to\_runnable
def to_runnable() -> Runnable#### register\_validator
def register_validator(
name: str,
data_type: Union[str, List[str]],
has_guardrails_endpoint: bool = False
) -> Callable[[Union[Type[V], Callable]], Union[Type[V], Type[Validator]]]Register a validator for a data type.
ValidationResult
class ValidationResult(IValidationResult, ArbitraryModel)ValidationResult is the output type of Validator.validate and the
abstract base class for all validation results.
Attributes:
- outcome _str_ - The outcome of the validation. Must be one of "pass" or "fail".metadata
- _Optional[Dict[str, Any]]_ - The metadata associated with thisvalidated_chunk
validation result.
- _Optional[Any]_ - The value argument passed to
validator.validate or validator.validate_stream.
PassResult
class PassResult(ValidationResult, IPassResult)PassResult is the output type of Validator.validate when validation
succeeds.
Attributes:
- outcome _Literal["pass"]_ - The outcome of the validation. Must be "pass".value_override
- _Optional[Any]_ - The value to use as an override
if validation passes.
FailResult
class FailResult(ValidationResult, IFailResult)FailResult is the output type of Validator.validate when validation
fails.
Attributes:
- outcome _Literal["fail"]_ - The outcome of the validation. Must be "fail".error_message
- _str_ - The error message indicating why validation failed.fix_value
- _Optional[Any]_ - The auto-fix value that would be appliederror_spans
if the Validator's on_fail method is "fix".
- _Optional[List[ErrorSpan]]_ - Segments that caused
validation to fail.
ErrorSpan
class ErrorSpan(IErrorSpan, ArbitraryModel)ErrorSpan provide additional context for why a validation failed. They
specify the start and end index of the segment that caused the failure,
which can be useful when validating large chunks of text or validating
while streaming with different chunking methods.
Attributes:
- start _int_ - Starting index relative to the validated chunk.end
- _int_ - Ending index relative to the validated chunk.reason
- _str_ - Reason validation failed for this chunk.
ValidatorLogs
class ValidatorLogs(IValidatorLog, ArbitraryModel)Logs for a single validator execution.
Attributes:
- validator_name _str_ - The class name of the validatorregistered_name
- _str_ - The snake_cased id of the validatorproperty_path
- _str_ - The JSON path to the property being validatedvalue_before_validation
- _Any_ - The value before validationvalue_after_validation
- _Optional[Any]_ - The value after validation;value_override
could be different if s or fixes are appliedvalidation_result
- _Optional[ValidationResult]_ - The result of the validationstart_time
- _Optional[datetime]_ - The time the validation startedend_time
- _Optional[datetime]_ - The time the validation endedinstance_id
- _Optional[int]_ - The unique id of this instance of the validator
ValidatorReference
class ValidatorReference(IValidatorReference)ValidatorReference is a serialized reference for constructing a
Validator.
Attributes:
- id _Optional[str]_ - The unique identifier for this Validator.on
Often the hub id; e.g. guardrails/regex_match. Default None.
- _Optional[str]_ - A reference to the property this validator should beprompt
applied against. Can be a valid JSON path or a meta-property
such as or output. Default None.on_fail
- _Optional[str]_ - The OnFailAction to apply during validation.args
Default None.
- _Optional[List[Any]]_ - Positional arguments. Default None.kwargs
- _Optional[Dict[str, Any]]_ - Keyword arguments. Default None.
---
CONTRIBUTING
Contributing to Guardrails
Welcome and thank you for your interest in contributing to Guardrails! We appreciate all contributions, big or small, from bug fixes to new features. Before diving in, let's go through some guidelines to make the process smoother for everyone.
Getting Started
1. If you're fixing a bug or typo, feel free to submit a Pull Request directly.
2. For new features or bug fix discussions, open an issue or join our Discord server to chat with the community.
Setting Up Your Environment
1. Clone the repository: git clone https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails.gitcd guardrails
2. Enter the project directory: make dev
3. Install the project in developer mode (use a virtual environment if preferred): pre-commit install
4. Install pre-commit:
Development Workflow
Follow these steps before committing your changes:
1. Ensure tests pass: make testmake autoformat
2. Format your code: make type
3. Run static analysis: make docs-gen
4. Update documentation:
Optional: Pre-Commit Hooks
For convenience, consider installing the pre-commit hooks provided in the repository. These hooks automatically run tests and formatting checks each time you commit, reducing development overhead.
Submitting a Pull Request
1. Ensure all tests pass and code is formatted.
2. Create a pull request with a clear description of your changes. Link to relevant issues or discussions. Follow this guide if needed.
3. Address any failing checks before requesting a review.
4. Engage in the code review process and make any necessary changes.
5. Celebrate when your pull request is merged! Your changes will be available in the next Guardrails release.
Thank you for your contribution and happy coding!
---
README
<div align="center">
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/main/docs/assets/Guardrails-ai-logo-for-dark-bg.svg#gh-dark-mode-only" alt="Guardrails AI Logo" width="600px">
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/main/docs/assets/Guardrails-ai-logo-for-white-bg.svg#gh-light-mode-only" alt="Guardrails AI Logo" width="600px">
<hr>
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0)
[](https://pepy.tech/project/guardrails-ai)
[](https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](https://codecov.io/gh/guardrails-ai/guardrails)
[](https://microsoft.github.io/pyright/)
[](https://x.com/guardrails_ai)
[](https://discord.gg/U9RKkZSBgx)
[](https://guardrailsai.com/guardrails/docs)
[](https://www.guardrailsai.com/blog)
[](https://gurubase.io/g/guardrails)
</div>
News and Updates
- [July 6, 2026] Guardrails validators are moving to standard PyPI packages you install directly with pip
, and Guardrails is discontinuing its hosted remote inferencing. See How to Migrate for what to do. Planned cutoff: August 6, 2026.
- [Feb 12, 2025] We just launched Guardrails Index -- the first of its kind benchmark comparing the performance and latency of 24 guardrails across 6 most common categories! Check out the index at index.guardrailsai.comWhat is Guardrails?
Guardrails is a Python framework that helps build reliable AI applications by performing two key functions:
1. Guardrails runs Input/Output Guards in your application that detect, quantify and mitigate the presence of specific types of risks. To look at the full suite of risks, check out Guardrails Hub.
2. Guardrails help you generate structured data from LLMs.
<div align="center">
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/main/docs/assets/with_and_without_guardrails.svg" alt="Guardrails in your application" width="1500px">
</div>
Guardrails Hub
Guardrails Hub is a collection of pre-built measures of specific types of risks (called 'validators'). Multiple validators can be combined together into Input and Output Guards that intercept the inputs and outputs of LLMs. Visit Guardrails Hub to see the full list of validators and their documentation.
<div align="center">
<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/main/docs/assets/guardrails_hub.gif" alt="Guardrails Hub gif" width="600px">
</div>
Installation
pythonpip install guardrails-ai
Getting Started
Create Input and Output Guards for LLM Validation
1. Download and configure the Guardrails Hub CLI.
bashpip install guardrails-ai
guardrails configure
2. Install a guardrail from Guardrails Hub.
bashpip install guardrails-ai-regex-match
3. Create a Guard from the installed guardrail.
pythonfrom guardrails import Guard, OnFailAction
from guardrails_ai.regex_match import RegexMatch guard = Guard().use(
RegexMatch, regex="\(?\d{3}\)?-? \d{3}-? -?\d{4}", on_fail=OnFailAction.EXCEPTION
)
guard.validate("123-456-7890") # Guardrail passes
try:
guard.validate("1234-789-0000") # Guardrail fails
except Exception as e:
print(e)
Output:
consoleValidation failed for field with errors: Result must match \(?\d{3}\)?-? \d{3}-? -?\d{4}
4. Run multiple guardrails within a Guard.
First, install the necessary guardrails from Guardrails Hub.
bashpip install guardrails-ai-competitor-check guardrails-ai-toxic-language
Then, create a Guard from the installed guardrails.
pythonfrom guardrails import Guard, OnFailAction
from guardrails_ai.competitor_check import CompetitorCheck
from guardrails_ai.toxic_language import ToxicLanguage guard = Guard().use(
CompetitorCheck(["Apple", "Microsoft", "Google"], on_fail=OnFailAction.EXCEPTION),
ToxicLanguage(threshold=0.5, validation_method="sentence", on_fail=OnFailAction.EXCEPTION)
)
guard.validate(
"""An apple a day keeps a doctor away.
This is good advice for keeping your health."""
) # Both the guardrails pass
try:
guard.validate(
"""Shut the hell up! Apple just released a new iPhone."""
) # Both the guardrails fail
except Exception as e:
print(e)
Output:
consoleValidation failed for field with errors: Found the following competitors: [['Apple']]. Please avoid naming those competitors next time, The following sentences in your response were found to be toxic: - Shut the hell up!
Use Guardrails to generate structured data from LLMs
Let's go through an example where we ask an LLM to generate fake pet names. To do this, we'll create a Pydantic BaseModel that represents the structure of the output we want.
pyfrom pydantic import BaseModel, Fieldclass Pet(BaseModel):
pet_type: str = Field(description="Species of pet")
name: str = Field(description="a unique pet name")
Now, create a Guard from the
Pet class. The Guard can be used to call the LLM in a manner so that the output is formatted to the Pet class. Under the hood, this is done by either of two methods:
1. Function calling: For LLMs that support function calling, we generate structured data using the function call syntax.
2. Prompt optimization: For LLMs that don't support function calling, we add the schema of the expected output to the prompt so that the LLM can generate structured data.pyfrom guardrails import Guard
import openaiprompt = """
What kind of pet should I get and what should I name it?
${gr.complete_json_suffix_v2}
"""
guard = Guard.for_pydantic(output_class=Pet, prompt=prompt)
raw_output, validated_output, *rest = guard(
llm_api=openai.completions.create,
engine="gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct"
)
print(validated_output)
This prints:
text{
"pet_type": "dog",
"name": "Buddy
}
Guardrails Server
Guardrails can be set up as a standalone service served by Flask with
guardrails start, allowing you to interact with it via a REST API. This approach simplifies development and deployment of Guardrails-powered applications.1. Install:
pip install "guardrails-ai"
2. Configure: guardrails configure
3. Create a config: guardrails create --validators=hub://guardrails/two_words --guard-name=two-word-guard
4. Start the dev server: guardrails start --config=./config.py`5. Interact with the dev server via the snippets below
with the guardrails client
import guardrails as grgr.settings.use_server = True
guard = gr.Guard(name='two-word-guard')
guard.validate('this is more than two words')
or with the openai sdk
import openai
openai.base_url = "http://localhost:8000/guards/two-word-guard/openai/v1/"
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "youropenaikey"messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "tell me about an apple with 3 words exactly",
},
]
completion = openai.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
messages=messages,
)
For production deployments, we recommend using Docker with Gunicorn as the WSGI server for improved performance and scalability.
FAQ
#### I'm running into issues with Guardrails. Where can I get help?
You can reach out to us on Discord or Twitter.
#### Can I use Guardrails with any LLM?
Yes, Guardrails can be used with proprietary and open-source LLMs. Check out this guide on how to use Guardrails with any LLM.
#### Can I create my own validators?
Yes, you can create your own validators and contribute them to Guardrails Hub. Check out this guide on how to create your own validators.
#### Does Guardrails support other languages?
Guardrails can be used with Python and JavaScript. Check out the docs on how to use Guardrails from JavaScript. We are working on adding support for other languages. If you would like to contribute to Guardrails, please reach out to us on Discord or Twitter.
Contributing
We welcome contributions to Guardrails!
Get started by checking out Github issues and check out the Contributing Guide. Feel free to open an issue, or reach out if you would like to add to the project!
---